Xeon E5-2620 v4 vs FX 6300
Description
The E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the 6300 is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v4 gets a score of 147.8 k points while the 6300 gets 66.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 2.2 times faster than the 6300. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v4 gets a score of 147.8 k points while the 6300 gets 66.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 2.2 times faster than the 6300. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406f1
600f20
Core
Broadwell-EP
Vishera
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
Socket 2011-3
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/6
TDP
85 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
3x2048 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2016
October 2012
Mean monothread perf.
29.39k points
23.14k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.83k points
66.43k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
6300
Test#1 (Integers)
6.04k
7.71k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
10.18k
7.41k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.74k
2.81k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.41k
5.2k (x2.16)
TOTAL
21.37k
23.14k (x1.08)
Multithread
E5-2620 v4
6300
Test#1 (Integers)
47.51k
25.2k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
75.12k
25.83k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.72k
11.47k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.45k
3.92k (x0.72)
TOTAL
147.8k
66.43k (x0.45)
Performance/W
E5-2620 v4
6300
Test#1 (Integers)
559 points/W
265 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
884 points/W
272 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
232 points/W
121 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
64 points/W
41 points/W
TOTAL
1739 points/W
699 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2620 v4
6300
Test#1 (Integers)
2013 points/GHz
2030 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3393 points/GHz
1951 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
915 points/GHz
741 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
802 points/GHz
1367 points/GHz
TOTAL
7123 points/GHz
6088 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4