Xeon E5-2620 v4 vs Athlon 5150 APU
Description
The E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the 5150 APU is based on Jaguar.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v4 gets a score of 147.8 k points while the 5150 APU gets 30.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 4.9 times faster than the 5150 APU. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v4 gets a score of 147.8 k points while the 5150 APU gets 30.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 4.9 times faster than the 5150 APU. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406f1
700f01
Core
Broadwell-EP
Kabini
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
1.6 GHz
Socket
Socket 2011-3
AM1
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
85 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
256 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
0 kB
Date
March 2016
April 2014
Mean monothread perf.
29.39k points
8.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.83k points
30.06k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
5150 APU
Test#1 (Integers)
6.04k
3.02k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
10.18k
2.62k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.74k
1.59k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.41k
1.02k (x0.42)
TOTAL
21.37k
8.26k (x0.39)
Multithread
E5-2620 v4
5150 APU
Test#1 (Integers)
47.51k
12.06k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
75.12k
10.42k (x0.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.72k
6.32k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.45k
1.26k (x0.23)
TOTAL
147.8k
30.06k (x0.2)
Performance/W
E5-2620 v4
5150 APU
Test#1 (Integers)
559 points/W
483 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
884 points/W
417 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
232 points/W
253 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
64 points/W
50 points/W
TOTAL
1739 points/W
1203 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2620 v4
5150 APU
Test#1 (Integers)
2013 points/GHz
1890 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3393 points/GHz
1637 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
915 points/GHz
997 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
802 points/GHz
639 points/GHz
TOTAL
7123 points/GHz
5162 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4