Xeon E5-2620 v4 vs A6 9210
Description
The E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the 9210 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v4 gets a score of 147.8 k points while the 9210 gets 27.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 5.5 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v4 gets a score of 147.8 k points while the 9210 gets 27.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 5.5 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406f1
670f00
Core
Broadwell-EP
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
Socket 2011-3
Socket FP4
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/2
TDP
85 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
1x96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
0 kB
Date
March 2016
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
29.39k points
20.78k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.83k points
27.13k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
8.22k
4.87k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
12.06k
10.38k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.01k
2.59k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.89k
2.38k (x0.82)
TOTAL
27.18k
20.22k (x0.74)
Multithread
E5-2620 v4
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
61.34k
7.41k (x0.12)
Test#2 (FP)
90.21k
11.87k (x0.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.2k
3.35k (x0.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.62k
2.6k (x0.56)
TOTAL
182.37k
25.23k (x0.14)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
6.04k
4.71k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
10.18k
11.03k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.74k
2.59k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.41k
2.45k (x1.02)
TOTAL
21.37k
20.78k (x0.97)
Multithread
E5-2620 v4
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
47.51k
8.43k (x0.18)
Test#2 (FP)
75.12k
12.8k (x0.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.72k
3.32k (x0.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.45k
2.59k (x0.47)
TOTAL
147.8k
27.13k (x0.18)
Performance/W
E5-2620 v4
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
559 points/W
562 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
884 points/W
853 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
232 points/W
221 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
64 points/W
172 points/W
TOTAL
1739 points/W
1809 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2620 v4
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
2013 points/GHz
1683 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3393 points/GHz
3938 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
915 points/GHz
927 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
802 points/GHz
873 points/GHz
TOTAL
7123 points/GHz
7420 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4