Xeon E5-2620 v4 vs A10 5745M
Description
The E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the 5745M is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v4 gets a score of 147.8 k points while the 5745M gets 37.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 4 times faster than the 5745M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v4 gets a score of 147.8 k points while the 5745M gets 37.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 4 times faster than the 5745M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406f1
610f31
Core
Broadwell-EP
Richland
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
Socket 2011-3
Socket FP2
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
85 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x64+4x16 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
2x2048 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
0 kB
Date
March 2016
May 2013
Mean monothread perf.
29.39k points
17.08k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.83k points
37.11k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2620 v4
5745M
Test#1 (Integers)
6.04k
6.66k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
10.18k
5.63k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.74k
2.4k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.41k
2.39k (x0.99)
TOTAL
21.37k
17.08k (x0.8)
Multithread
E5-2620 v4
5745M
Test#1 (Integers)
47.51k
13.55k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
75.12k
13.9k (x0.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.72k
6.75k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.45k
2.91k (x0.53)
TOTAL
147.8k
37.11k (x0.25)
Performance/W
E5-2620 v4
5745M
Test#1 (Integers)
559 points/W
542 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
884 points/W
556 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
232 points/W
270 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
64 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
1739 points/W
1484 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2620 v4
5745M
Test#1 (Integers)
2013 points/GHz
2297 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3393 points/GHz
1941 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
915 points/GHz
828 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
802 points/GHz
823 points/GHz
TOTAL
7123 points/GHz
5889 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4