Core E5-2620 v3 vs Xeon Silver 4110
Description
The E5-2620 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the 4110 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v3 gets a score of 358 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v3 is 1.3 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v3 gets a score of 358 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v3 is 1.3 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
50654
Core
Haswell-EP
Skylake-SP
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA3647
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
85 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
11264 kB
Date
September 2014
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
35.86k points
45.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
357.99k points
281.48k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2620 v3
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
18.64k
18.78k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
16.25k (x1.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.12k
3.99k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.54k
6.8k (x2.68)
TOTAL
35.86k
45.82k (x1.28)
Multithread
E5-2620 v3
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
181.66k
133.55k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
122.09k
108.43k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
47.02k
30.02k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.22k
9.48k (x1.31)
TOTAL
357.99k
281.48k (x0.79)
Performance/W
E5-2620 v3
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
2137 points/W
1571 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1436 points/W
1276 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
553 points/W
353 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
85 points/W
112 points/W
TOTAL
4212 points/W
3311 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2620 v3
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
5826 points/GHz
6259 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3297 points/GHz
5417 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1288 points/GHz
1330 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
794 points/GHz
2267 points/GHz
TOTAL
11205 points/GHz
15273 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4