Core E5-2620 v3 vs Xeon E5-2680 v4
Description
The E5-2620 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the E5-2680 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v3 gets a score of 358 k points while the E5-2680 v4 gets 1162.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 3.2 times faster than the E5-2620 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v3 gets a score of 358 k points while the E5-2680 v4 gets 1162.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 3.2 times faster than the E5-2620 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
406f1
Core
Haswell-EP
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
6/12
14/28
TDP
85 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
14x32+14x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
14x256 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
35840 kB
Date
September 2014
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
35.86k points
41.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
357.99k points
1162.63k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2620 v3
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
18.64k
17.8k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
16.51k (x1.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.12k
4.47k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.54k
2.56k (x1.01)
TOTAL
35.86k
41.35k (x1.15)
Multithread
E5-2620 v3
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
181.66k
494.82k (x2.72)
Test#2 (FP)
122.09k
514.13k (x4.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
47.02k
132.87k (x2.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.22k
20.8k (x2.88)
TOTAL
357.99k
1162.63k (x3.25)
Performance/W
E5-2620 v3
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
2137 points/W
4124 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1436 points/W
4284 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
553 points/W
1107 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
85 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
4212 points/W
9689 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2620 v3
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
5826 points/GHz
5393 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3297 points/GHz
5004 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1288 points/GHz
1355 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
794 points/GHz
777 points/GHz
TOTAL
11205 points/GHz
12529 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4