| | | | | | |

Core E5-2620 v3 vs Xeon E3-1220 v3


Description
Both models E5-2620 v3 and E3-1220 v3 are based on Haswell architecture.

"Haswell is known as fourth-generation core too. It uses 22nm Tri-Gate FinFET (non-planar, ""3D"") technology. It includes four arithmetic logic unit (ALU) and three address generation unit (AGU). This generation is able to run Advanced Vector Extensions 2 (AVX2) instruction set among BMI1, BMI2, ABM and FMA3. At this time, Intel used new sockets: LGA 1150 for desktops and BGA1364 for the mobile CPUs."

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v3 gets a score of 358 k points while the E3-1220 v3 gets 140.8 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2620 v3 is 2.5 times faster than the E3-1220 v3 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
306c3
Core
Haswell-EP
Haswell-WS
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
6/12
4 /4
TDP
85 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2014
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
35.86k points
39.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
357.99k points
140.76k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2620 v3
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
18.64k
19.17k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
10.55k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.12k
4.79k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.54k
4.65k (x1.83)
TOTAL
35.86k
39.16k (x1.09)

Multithread

E5-2620 v3

E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
181.66k
73.13k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
122.09k
42.06k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
47.02k
18.03k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.22k
7.54k (x1.04)
TOTAL
357.99k
140.76k (x0.39)

Performance/W
E5-2620 v3
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
2137 points/W
914 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1436 points/W
526 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
553 points/W
225 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
85 points/W
94 points/W
TOTAL
4212 points/W
1759 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2620 v3
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
5826 points/GHz
5478 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3297 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1288 points/GHz
1368 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
794 points/GHz
1328 points/GHz
TOTAL
11205 points/GHz
11188 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4