Core E5-2620 v3 vs i9-9900K
Description
The E5-2620 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v3 gets a score of 358 k points while the i9-9900K gets 545.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 1.5 times faster than the E5-2620 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v3 gets a score of 358 k points while the i9-9900K gets 545.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 1.5 times faster than the E5-2620 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
906ec
Core
Haswell-EP
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
85 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2014
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
35.86k points
86.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
357.99k points
545.3k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2620 v3
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
18.64k
33.62k (x1.8)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
30.02k (x2.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.12k
7.17k (x1.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.54k
15.43k (x6.08)
TOTAL
35.86k
86.24k (x2.41)
Multithread
E5-2620 v3
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
181.66k
248.93k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
122.09k
224.43k (x1.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
47.02k
53.39k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.22k
18.54k (x2.57)
TOTAL
357.99k
545.3k (x1.52)
Performance/W
E5-2620 v3
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
2137 points/W
2620 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1436 points/W
2362 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
553 points/W
562 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
85 points/W
195 points/W
TOTAL
4212 points/W
5740 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2620 v3
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
5826 points/GHz
6724 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3297 points/GHz
6003 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1288 points/GHz
1434 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
794 points/GHz
3087 points/GHz
TOTAL
11205 points/GHz
17247 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4