Core E5-2620 v3 vs i7-10610U
Description
The E5-2620 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i7-10610U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v3 gets a score of 358 k points while the i7-10610U gets 162 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v3 is 2.2 times faster than the i7-10610U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v3 gets a score of 358 k points while the i7-10610U gets 162 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v3 is 2.2 times faster than the i7-10610U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
806ec
Core
Haswell-EP
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
FCBGA 1528
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
85 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2014
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
35.86k points
56.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
357.99k points
162k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2620 v3
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.64k
23.1k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
20k (x1.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.12k
4.61k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.54k
8.94k (x3.52)
TOTAL
35.86k
56.65k (x1.58)
Multithread
E5-2620 v3
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
181.66k
73.36k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
122.09k
68.28k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
47.02k
13.73k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.22k
6.62k (x0.92)
TOTAL
357.99k
162k (x0.45)
Performance/W
E5-2620 v3
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
2137 points/W
2934 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1436 points/W
2731 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
553 points/W
549 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
85 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
4212 points/W
6480 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2620 v3
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
5826 points/GHz
4715 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3297 points/GHz
4082 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1288 points/GHz
940 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
794 points/GHz
1825 points/GHz
TOTAL
11205 points/GHz
11562 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4