| | | | | | |

Core E5-2620 v3 vs i5-10500H


Description
The E5-2620 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-10500H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v3 gets a score of 358 k points while the i5-10500H gets 379 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10500H is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2620 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
a0652
Core
Haswell-EP
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
85 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2014
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
35.86k points
72.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
357.99k points
378.99k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2620 v3
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
18.64k
27.93k (x1.5)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
25.41k (x2.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.12k
5.91k (x1.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.54k
12.85k (x5.06)
TOTAL
35.86k
72.1k (x2.01)

Multithread

E5-2620 v3

i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
181.66k
176.41k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
122.09k
158.8k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
47.02k
38.53k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.22k
5.25k (x0.73)
TOTAL
357.99k
378.99k (x1.06)

Performance/W
E5-2620 v3
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
2137 points/W
2714 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1436 points/W
2443 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
553 points/W
593 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
85 points/W
81 points/W
TOTAL
4212 points/W
5831 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2620 v3
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
5826 points/GHz
6207 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3297 points/GHz
5647 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1288 points/GHz
1313 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
794 points/GHz
2856 points/GHz
TOTAL
11205 points/GHz
16023 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4