Core E5-2620 v3 vs i5-10400F
Description
The E5-2620 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v3 gets a score of 358 k points while the i5-10400F gets 390.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2620 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v3 gets a score of 358 k points while the i5-10400F gets 390.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2620 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
a0655
Core
Haswell-EP
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
85 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
16386 kB
Date
September 2014
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
35.86k points
72.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
357.99k points
390.78k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2620 v3
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
18.64k
28.39k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
24.89k (x2.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.12k
5.78k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.54k
13.19k (x5.19)
TOTAL
35.86k
72.25k (x2.02)
Multithread
E5-2620 v3
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
181.66k
180.2k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
122.09k
163.51k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
47.02k
40.6k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.22k
6.48k (x0.9)
TOTAL
357.99k
390.78k (x1.09)
Performance/W
E5-2620 v3
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
2137 points/W
2772 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1436 points/W
2515 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
553 points/W
625 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
85 points/W
100 points/W
TOTAL
4212 points/W
6012 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2620 v3
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5826 points/GHz
6603 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3297 points/GHz
5788 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1288 points/GHz
1344 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
794 points/GHz
3067 points/GHz
TOTAL
11205 points/GHz
16803 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4