Core E5-2620 v3 vs i3-6006U
Description
The E5-2620 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i3-6006U is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v3 gets a score of 358 k points while the i3-6006U gets 68.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v3 is 5.2 times faster than the i3-6006U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v3 gets a score of 358 k points while the i3-6006U gets 68.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v3 is 5.2 times faster than the i3-6006U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
406e3
Core
Haswell-EP
Skylake-U
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
85 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2014
November 2016
Mean monothread perf.
35.86k points
31.3k points
Mean multithread perf.
357.99k points
68.38k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2620 v3
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.64k
12.89k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
11.72k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.12k
2.74k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.54k
3.95k (x1.56)
TOTAL
35.86k
31.3k (x0.87)
Multithread
E5-2620 v3
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
181.66k
29.95k (x0.16)
Test#2 (FP)
122.09k
27.93k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
47.02k
6.74k (x0.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.22k
3.77k (x0.52)
TOTAL
357.99k
68.38k (x0.19)
Performance/W
E5-2620 v3
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
2137 points/W
1997 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1436 points/W
1862 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
553 points/W
449 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
85 points/W
251 points/W
TOTAL
4212 points/W
4559 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2620 v3
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
5826 points/GHz
6444 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3297 points/GHz
5858 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1288 points/GHz
1371 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
794 points/GHz
1975 points/GHz
TOTAL
11205 points/GHz
15649 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4