Core E5-2620 v3 vs Ryzen 5 5500U
Description
The E5-2620 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the 5500U is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v3 gets a score of 358 k points while the 5500U gets 261.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v3 is 1.4 times faster than the 5500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v3 gets a score of 358 k points while the 5500U gets 261.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v3 is 1.4 times faster than the 5500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
860f81
Core
Haswell-EP
Lucienne
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
85 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
September 2014
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
35.86k points
53.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
357.99k points
261.91k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2620 v3
5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.64k
15.63k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
23k (x2.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.12k
8.62k (x2.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.54k
6.51k (x2.56)
TOTAL
35.86k
53.76k (x1.5)
Multithread
E5-2620 v3
5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
181.66k
90.38k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
122.09k
118.74k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
47.02k
48.39k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.22k
4.4k (x0.61)
TOTAL
357.99k
261.91k (x0.73)
Performance/W
E5-2620 v3
5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
2137 points/W
6025 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1436 points/W
7916 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
553 points/W
3226 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
85 points/W
294 points/W
TOTAL
4212 points/W
17461 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2620 v3
5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
5826 points/GHz
3908 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3297 points/GHz
5750 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1288 points/GHz
2156 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
794 points/GHz
1628 points/GHz
TOTAL
11205 points/GHz
13441 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4