Core E5-2620 v3 vs Ryzen 5 2600X
Description
The E5-2620 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the 2600X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v3 gets a score of 358 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v3 is 1.1 times faster than the 2600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v3 gets a score of 358 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v3 is 1.1 times faster than the 2600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
800f82
Core
Haswell-EP
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
85 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
September 2014
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
35.86k points
66.44k points
Mean multithread perf.
357.99k points
333.12k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2620 v3
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
18.64k
15.75k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
26.29k (x2.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.12k
5.91k (x1.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.54k
18.48k (x7.28)
TOTAL
35.86k
66.44k (x1.85)
Multithread
E5-2620 v3
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
181.66k
94.49k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
122.09k
182.53k (x1.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
47.02k
45.95k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.22k
10.15k (x1.41)
TOTAL
357.99k
333.12k (x0.93)
Performance/W
E5-2620 v3
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
2137 points/W
995 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1436 points/W
1921 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
553 points/W
484 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
85 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
4212 points/W
3507 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2620 v3
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
5826 points/GHz
3749 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3297 points/GHz
6261 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1288 points/GHz
1408 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
794 points/GHz
4401 points/GHz
TOTAL
11205 points/GHz
15819 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4