Core E5-2620 v3 vs A9 9425
Description
The E5-2620 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the 9425 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v3 gets a score of 358 k points while the 9425 gets 41.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v3 is 8.6 times faster than the 9425. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v3 gets a score of 358 k points while the 9425 gets 41.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v3 is 8.6 times faster than the 9425. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
670f00
Core
Haswell-EP
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA-FP4
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/2
TDP
85 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
0 kB
Date
September 2014
May 2018
Mean monothread perf.
35.86k points
31.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
357.99k points
41.73k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2620 v3
9425
Test#1 (Integers)
18.64k
11.23k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
14.7k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.12k
3.15k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.54k
2.24k (x0.88)
TOTAL
35.86k
31.31k (x0.87)
Multithread
E5-2620 v3
9425
Test#1 (Integers)
181.66k
16.58k (x0.09)
Test#2 (FP)
122.09k
17.84k (x0.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
47.02k
5.09k (x0.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.22k
2.23k (x0.31)
TOTAL
357.99k
41.73k (x0.12)
Performance/W
E5-2620 v3
9425
Test#1 (Integers)
2137 points/W
1105 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1436 points/W
1189 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
553 points/W
339 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
85 points/W
148 points/W
TOTAL
4212 points/W
2782 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2620 v3
9425
Test#1 (Integers)
5826 points/GHz
3034 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3297 points/GHz
3972 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1288 points/GHz
850 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
794 points/GHz
605 points/GHz
TOTAL
11205 points/GHz
8461 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4