Core E5-2620 v3 vs Mobile 3020e
Description
The E5-2620 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the 3020e is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v3 gets a score of 358 k points while the 3020e gets 52.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v3 is 6.8 times faster than the 3020e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 v3 gets a score of 358 k points while the 3020e gets 52.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v3 is 6.8 times faster than the 3020e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
820f01
Core
Haswell-EP
Dali
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
1.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/2
TDP
85 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2014
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
35.86k points
29.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
357.99k points
52.42k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2620 v3
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
18.64k
9.28k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
14.56k (x1.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.12k
3.44k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.54k
2.06k (x0.81)
TOTAL
35.86k
29.34k (x0.82)
Multithread
E5-2620 v3
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
181.66k
15.75k (x0.09)
Test#2 (FP)
122.09k
28.63k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
47.02k
5.87k (x0.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.22k
2.17k (x0.3)
TOTAL
357.99k
52.42k (x0.15)
Performance/W
E5-2620 v3
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
2137 points/W
2625 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1436 points/W
4771 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
553 points/W
979 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
85 points/W
361 points/W
TOTAL
4212 points/W
8737 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2620 v3
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
5826 points/GHz
3570 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3297 points/GHz
5602 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1288 points/GHz
1323 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
794 points/GHz
792 points/GHz
TOTAL
11205 points/GHz
11287 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4