Xeon E5-2620 vs Core i7-7700HQ
Description
The E5-2620 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i7-7700HQ is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 gets a score of 224.7 k points while the i7-7700HQ gets 169.2 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 is 1.3 times faster than the i7-7700HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 gets a score of 224.7 k points while the i7-7700HQ gets 169.2 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 is 1.3 times faster than the i7-7700HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206d7
906e9
Core
Sandy Bridge-EP
Kaby Lake-H
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
95 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2012
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
18.8k points
56.29k points
Mean multithread perf.
224.7k points
208.33k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2620
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
6.95k
13k (x1.87)
Test#2 (FP)
6.24k
20.34k (x3.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.05k
4.77k (x1.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.56k
6.95k (x2.71)
TOTAL
18.8k
45.05k (x2.4)
Multithread
E5-2620
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
90.01k
52.7k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
82.43k
89.69k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
42.59k
22.49k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.66k
4.3k (x0.44)
TOTAL
224.7k
169.17k (x0.75)
Performance/W
E5-2620
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
948 points/W
1171 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
868 points/W
1993 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
448 points/W
500 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
102 points/W
95 points/W
TOTAL
2365 points/W
3759 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2620
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
2780 points/GHz
3421 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2494 points/GHz
5351 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1220 points/GHz
1255 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1024 points/GHz
1829 points/GHz
TOTAL
7519 points/GHz
11857 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4