Xeon E5-2620 vs Core i7-10510U
Description
The E5-2620 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i7-10510U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 gets a score of 224.7 k points while the i7-10510U gets 169.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 is 1.3 times faster than the i7-10510U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 gets a score of 224.7 k points while the i7-10510U gets 169.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 is 1.3 times faster than the i7-10510U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206d7
806ec
Core
Sandy Bridge-EP
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2012
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
18.8k points
59.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
224.7k points
190.82k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2620
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
6.95k
17.52k (x2.52)
Test#2 (FP)
6.24k
26.74k (x4.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.05k
6.22k (x2.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.56k
13.33k (x5.2)
TOTAL
18.8k
63.81k (x3.39)
Multithread
E5-2620
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
90.01k
54.53k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
82.43k
85.61k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
42.59k
20.87k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.66k
8.05k (x0.83)
TOTAL
224.7k
169.07k (x0.75)
Performance/W
E5-2620
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
948 points/W
3635 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
868 points/W
5707 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
448 points/W
1391 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
102 points/W
537 points/W
TOTAL
2365 points/W
11271 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2620
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
2780 points/GHz
3576 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2494 points/GHz
5457 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1220 points/GHz
1269 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1024 points/GHz
2720 points/GHz
TOTAL
7519 points/GHz
13022 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4