| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2620 vs Core i5-9500T


Description
The E5-2620 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i5-9500T is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 gets a score of 224.7 k points while the i5-9500T gets 211.7 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2620 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-9500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206d7
906ea
Core
Sandy Bridge-EP
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/6
TDP
95 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
9216 kB
Date
March 2012
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
18.8k points
61.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
224.7k points
274.02k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2620
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
6.95k
13.46k (x1.94)
Test#2 (FP)
6.24k
20.21k (x3.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.05k
4.72k (x1.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.56k
10.25k (x4)
TOTAL
18.8k
48.64k (x2.59)

Multithread

E5-2620

i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
90.01k
74.65k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
82.43k
110.86k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
42.59k
22.08k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.66k
4.12k (x0.43)
TOTAL
224.7k
211.7k (x0.94)

Performance/W
E5-2620
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
948 points/W
2133 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
868 points/W
3167 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
448 points/W
631 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
102 points/W
118 points/W
TOTAL
2365 points/W
6049 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2620
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
2780 points/GHz
3638 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2494 points/GHz
5462 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1220 points/GHz
1275 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1024 points/GHz
2771 points/GHz
TOTAL
7519 points/GHz
13145 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4