Xeon E5-2620 vs Core i5-4570
Description
The E5-2620 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i5-4570 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 gets a score of 224.7 k points while the i5-4570 gets 124.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 is 1.8 times faster than the i5-4570 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 gets a score of 224.7 k points while the i5-4570 gets 124.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 is 1.8 times faster than the i5-4570 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206d7
306c3
Core
Sandy Bridge-EP
Haswell
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
95 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2012
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
18.8k points
43.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
224.7k points
161.61k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2620
i5-4570
Test#1 (Integers)
6.95k
13.13k (x1.89)
Test#2 (FP)
6.24k
12.02k (x1.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.05k
5k (x1.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.56k
4.65k (x1.82)
TOTAL
18.8k
34.8k (x1.85)
Multithread
E5-2620
i5-4570
Test#1 (Integers)
90.01k
49.75k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
82.43k
45.72k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
42.59k
19.93k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.66k
9.05k (x0.94)
TOTAL
224.7k
124.44k (x0.55)
Performance/W
E5-2620
i5-4570
Test#1 (Integers)
948 points/W
592 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
868 points/W
544 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
448 points/W
237 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
102 points/W
108 points/W
TOTAL
2365 points/W
1481 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2620
i5-4570
Test#1 (Integers)
2780 points/GHz
3648 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2494 points/GHz
3340 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1220 points/GHz
1388 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1024 points/GHz
1292 points/GHz
TOTAL
7519 points/GHz
9668 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4