| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2620 vs Core i5-2410M


Description
Both models E5-2620 and i5-2410M are based on Sandy Bridge architecture.

"Sandy Bridge codename was originally ""Gesher"". The development began in 2005 and four years later, the first Sandy Bridge CPU was presented. The most prominent features are Intel Turbo Boost 2.0, AES encryption and SHA-1 hashing acceleration, Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) 256-bit instruction set and the ability to have up to 8 physical cores or 16 logical cores through Hyper-Threading."

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 gets a score of 224.7 k points while the i5-2410M gets 38.7 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2620 is 5.8 times faster than the i5-2410M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206d7
206a7
Core
Sandy Bridge-EP
Sandy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
Socket G2 (988B)
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/2
TDP
95 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2012
February 2011
Mean monothread perf.
18.8k points
20.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
224.7k points
38.68k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2620
i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
6.95k
7.38k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
6.24k
6.76k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.05k
3.3k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.56k
2.66k (x1.04)
TOTAL
18.8k
20.1k (x1.07)

Multithread

E5-2620

i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
90.01k
14.17k (x0.16)
Test#2 (FP)
82.43k
14.71k (x0.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
42.59k
6.93k (x0.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.66k
2.87k (x0.3)
TOTAL
224.7k
38.68k (x0.17)

Performance/W
E5-2620
i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
948 points/W
405 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
868 points/W
420 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
448 points/W
198 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
102 points/W
82 points/W
TOTAL
2365 points/W
1105 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2620
i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
2780 points/GHz
2543 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2494 points/GHz
2332 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1220 points/GHz
1139 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1024 points/GHz
917 points/GHz
TOTAL
7519 points/GHz
6932 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4