Xeon E5-2620 vs Core i5-10500H
Description
The E5-2620 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i5-10500H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 gets a score of 224.7 k points while the i5-10500H gets 296 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500H is 1.3 times faster than the E5-2620. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 gets a score of 224.7 k points while the i5-10500H gets 296 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500H is 1.3 times faster than the E5-2620. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206d7
a0652
Core
Sandy Bridge-EP
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2012
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
18.8k points
72.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
224.7k points
378.99k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2620
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
6.95k
15.86k (x2.28)
Test#2 (FP)
6.24k
24.07k (x3.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.05k
5.94k (x1.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.56k
11.82k (x4.62)
TOTAL
18.8k
57.69k (x3.07)
Multithread
E5-2620
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
90.01k
97.37k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
82.43k
154.42k (x1.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
42.59k
38.76k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.66k
5.4k (x0.56)
TOTAL
224.7k
295.96k (x1.32)
Performance/W
E5-2620
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
948 points/W
1498 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
868 points/W
2376 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
448 points/W
596 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
102 points/W
83 points/W
TOTAL
2365 points/W
4553 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2620
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
2780 points/GHz
3524 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2494 points/GHz
5350 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1220 points/GHz
1320 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1024 points/GHz
2627 points/GHz
TOTAL
7519 points/GHz
12820 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4