Xeon E5-2620 vs Core i3-6100U
Description
The E5-2620 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i3-6100U is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 gets a score of 224.7 k points while the i3-6100U gets 56.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 is 4 times faster than the i3-6100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 gets a score of 224.7 k points while the i3-6100U gets 56.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 is 4 times faster than the i3-6100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206d7
406e3
Core
Sandy Bridge-EP
Skylake-U
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2012
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
18.8k points
30.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
224.7k points
69.94k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2620
i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
6.95k
8.06k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
6.24k
12.85k (x2.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.05k
3.14k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.56k
4.01k (x1.56)
TOTAL
18.8k
28.06k (x1.49)
Multithread
E5-2620
i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
90.01k
16.58k (x0.18)
Test#2 (FP)
82.43k
28.88k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
42.59k
7.38k (x0.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.66k
3.82k (x0.4)
TOTAL
224.7k
56.66k (x0.25)
Performance/W
E5-2620
i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
948 points/W
1105 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
868 points/W
1925 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
448 points/W
492 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
102 points/W
254 points/W
TOTAL
2365 points/W
3777 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2620
i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
2780 points/GHz
3506 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2494 points/GHz
5587 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1220 points/GHz
1366 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1024 points/GHz
1742 points/GHz
TOTAL
7519 points/GHz
12201 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4