Xeon E5-2620 vs Ryzen 5 3500U
Description
The E5-2620 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the 3500U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 gets a score of 224.7 k points while the 3500U gets 146.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 is 1.5 times faster than the 3500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 gets a score of 224.7 k points while the 3500U gets 146.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 is 1.5 times faster than the 3500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206d7
810f81
Core
Sandy Bridge-EP
Picasso
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2012
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
18.8k points
36.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
224.7k points
140.97k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2620
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
6.95k
11.1k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
6.24k
18.97k (x3.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.05k
3.9k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.56k
3.39k (x1.32)
TOTAL
18.8k
37.37k (x1.99)
Multithread
E5-2620
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
90.01k
45.74k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
82.43k
75.47k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
42.59k
21.89k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.66k
3.49k (x0.36)
TOTAL
224.7k
146.6k (x0.65)
Performance/W
E5-2620
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
948 points/W
3049 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
868 points/W
5032 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
448 points/W
1459 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
102 points/W
233 points/W
TOTAL
2365 points/W
9773 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2620
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
2780 points/GHz
3001 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2494 points/GHz
5128 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1220 points/GHz
1053 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1024 points/GHz
916 points/GHz
TOTAL
7519 points/GHz
10099 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4