Xeon E5-2620 vs Core i3-12100T
Description
The E5-2620 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i3-12100T is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 gets a score of 224.7 k points while the i3-12100T gets 247.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-12100T is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2620. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2620 gets a score of 224.7 k points while the i3-12100T gets 247.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-12100T is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2620. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206d7
90675
Core
Sandy Bridge-EP
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
95 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
15360 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2012
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
18.8k points
93.54k points
Mean multithread perf.
224.7k points
330.62k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2620
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
6.95k
22.25k (x3.2)
Test#2 (FP)
6.24k
23.16k (x3.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.05k
13.09k (x4.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.56k
13.21k (x5.16)
TOTAL
18.8k
71.7k (x3.81)
Multithread
E5-2620
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
90.01k
77.43k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
82.43k
109.08k (x1.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
42.59k
52.45k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.66k
8.75k (x0.91)
TOTAL
224.7k
247.71k (x1.1)
Performance/W
E5-2620
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
948 points/W
2212 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
868 points/W
3117 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
448 points/W
1499 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
102 points/W
250 points/W
TOTAL
2365 points/W
7077 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2620
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
2780 points/GHz
5426 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2494 points/GHz
5649 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1220 points/GHz
3192 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1024 points/GHz
3222 points/GHz
TOTAL
7519 points/GHz
17489 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4