Xeon E5-1660 v4 vs Core m7-6Y75
Description
The E5-1660 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the m7-6Y75 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-1660 v4 gets a score of 320.5 k points while the m7-6Y75 gets 53.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-1660 v4 is 6 times faster than the m7-6Y75. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-1660 v4 gets a score of 320.5 k points while the m7-6Y75 gets 53.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-1660 v4 is 6 times faster than the m7-6Y75. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406f1
406e3
Core
Broadwell-EP
Skylake-Y
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
1.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
Socket 2011-3
BGA1515
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/4
TDP
140 W
4,5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2016
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
37.6k points
33.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
320.49k points
53.58k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-1660 v4
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
12.41k
10.24k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
17.23k
15.33k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.89k
2.97k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.07k
5.32k (x1.73)
TOTAL
37.6k
33.86k (x0.9)
Multithread
E5-1660 v4
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
102.11k
16.78k (x0.16)
Test#2 (FP)
156.5k
25.09k (x0.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
42.08k
6.14k (x0.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.8k
5.58k (x0.28)
TOTAL
320.49k
53.58k (x0.17)
Performance/W
E5-1660 v4
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
729 points/W
4195 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1118 points/W
6272 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
301 points/W
1534 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
141 points/W
1394 points/W
TOTAL
2289 points/W
13395 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-1660 v4
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
3266 points/GHz
3304 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4534 points/GHz
4945 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1286 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
809 points/GHz
1715 points/GHz
TOTAL
9895 points/GHz
10922 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4