| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-1660 v4 vs Core i7-4790K


Description
The E5-1660 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the i7-4790K is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-1660 v4 gets a score of 320.5 k points while the i7-4790K gets 164.4 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-1660 v4 is 1.9 times faster than the i7-4790K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406f1
306c3
Core
Broadwell-EP
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
Socket 2011-3
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
140 W
88 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
8192 kB
Date
June 2016
May 2014
Mean monothread perf.
37.6k points
52.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
320.49k points
215.47k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-1660 v4
i7-4790K
Test#1 (Integers)
12.41k
15.8k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
17.23k
14.35k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.89k
5.97k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.07k
5.17k (x1.68)
TOTAL
37.6k
41.29k (x1.1)

Multithread

E5-1660 v4

i7-4790K
Test#1 (Integers)
102.11k
62.79k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
156.5k
66.48k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
42.08k
26.35k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.8k
8.74k (x0.44)
TOTAL
320.49k
164.36k (x0.51)

Performance/W
E5-1660 v4
i7-4790K
Test#1 (Integers)
729 points/W
713 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1118 points/W
755 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
301 points/W
299 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
141 points/W
99 points/W
TOTAL
2289 points/W
1868 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-1660 v4
i7-4790K
Test#1 (Integers)
3266 points/GHz
3591 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4534 points/GHz
3260 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1286 points/GHz
1358 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
809 points/GHz
1174 points/GHz
TOTAL
9895 points/GHz
9383 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4