Xeon E5-1660 v4 vs Core i5-9600KF
Description
The E5-1660 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the i5-9600KF is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-1660 v4 gets a score of 320.5 k points while the i5-9600KF gets 280.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-1660 v4 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-9600KF. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-1660 v4 gets a score of 320.5 k points while the i5-9600KF gets 280.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-1660 v4 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-9600KF. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406f1
906ec
Core
Broadwell-EP
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
Socket 2011-3
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/6
TDP
140 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
9216 kB
Date
June 2016
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
37.6k points
77.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
320.49k points
371.08k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-1660 v4
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
12.41k
16.92k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
17.23k
25.44k (x1.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.89k
6.36k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.07k
13.25k (x4.31)
TOTAL
37.6k
61.97k (x1.65)
Multithread
E5-1660 v4
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
102.11k
95.51k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
156.5k
143.19k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
42.08k
33.85k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.8k
8.21k (x0.41)
TOTAL
320.49k
280.77k (x0.88)
Performance/W
E5-1660 v4
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
729 points/W
1005 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1118 points/W
1507 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
301 points/W
356 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
141 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
2289 points/W
2955 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-1660 v4
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
3266 points/GHz
3679 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4534 points/GHz
5530 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1286 points/GHz
1383 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
809 points/GHz
2880 points/GHz
TOTAL
9895 points/GHz
13472 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4