| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-1660 v4 vs Core i5-5200U


Description
Both models E5-1660 v4 and i5-5200U are based on Broadwell architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-1660 v4 gets a score of 320.5 k points while the i5-5200U gets 50.9 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-1660 v4 is 6.3 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406f1
306d4
Core
Broadwell-EP
Broadwell-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
8/16
2 /4
TDP
140 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
3072 kB
Date
June 2016
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
37.6k points
31.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
320.49k points
68.69k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-1660 v4
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.41k
8.48k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
17.23k
12.03k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.89k
3.32k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.07k
2.79k (x0.91)
TOTAL
37.6k
26.62k (x0.71)

Multithread

E5-1660 v4

i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
102.11k
15.19k (x0.15)
Test#2 (FP)
156.5k
25.99k (x0.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
42.08k
6.71k (x0.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.8k
2.96k (x0.15)
TOTAL
320.49k
50.85k (x0.16)

Performance/W
E5-1660 v4
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
729 points/W
1013 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1118 points/W
1733 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
301 points/W
447 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
141 points/W
197 points/W
TOTAL
2289 points/W
3390 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-1660 v4
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3266 points/GHz
3140 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4534 points/GHz
4455 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1286 points/GHz
1231 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
809 points/GHz
1035 points/GHz
TOTAL
9895 points/GHz
9860 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4