Xeon E5-1660 v4 vs Core i3-6006U
Description
The E5-1660 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the i3-6006U is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-1660 v4 gets a score of 320.5 k points while the i3-6006U gets 49.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-1660 v4 is 6.4 times faster than the i3-6006U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-1660 v4 gets a score of 320.5 k points while the i3-6006U gets 49.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-1660 v4 is 6.4 times faster than the i3-6006U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406f1
406e3
Core
Broadwell-EP
Skylake-U
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
Socket 2011-3
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/4
TDP
140 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
3072 kB
Date
June 2016
November 2016
Mean monothread perf.
37.6k points
31.3k points
Mean multithread perf.
320.49k points
68.38k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-1660 v4
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.41k
7.34k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
17.23k
11.37k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.89k
2.74k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.07k
3.08k (x1)
TOTAL
37.6k
24.53k (x0.65)
Multithread
E5-1660 v4
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
102.11k
15.32k (x0.15)
Test#2 (FP)
156.5k
25.61k (x0.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
42.08k
6.36k (x0.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.8k
2.58k (x0.13)
TOTAL
320.49k
49.87k (x0.16)
Performance/W
E5-1660 v4
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
729 points/W
1022 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1118 points/W
1707 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
301 points/W
424 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
141 points/W
172 points/W
TOTAL
2289 points/W
3325 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-1660 v4
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
3266 points/GHz
3670 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4534 points/GHz
5683 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1286 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
809 points/GHz
1540 points/GHz
TOTAL
9895 points/GHz
12265 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4