Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs Core i7-6600U
Description
The E5-1620 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i7-6600U is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-1620 v2 gets a score of 144.6 k points while the i7-6600U gets 45.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-1620 v2 is 3.2 times faster than the i7-6600U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-1620 v2 gets a score of 144.6 k points while the i7-6600U gets 45.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-1620 v2 is 3.2 times faster than the i7-6600U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306e4
406e3
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Skylake-U
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4 /8
2/4
TDP
130 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
10240 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2013
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
34.37k points
39.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
144.57k points
79.22k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-1620 v2
i7-6600U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.55k
8.49k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
12.14k
10.92k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
2.76k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
4.93k (x1.02)
TOTAL
34.37k
27.1k (x0.79)
Multithread
E5-1620 v2
i7-6600U
Test#1 (Integers)
51.93k
14.11k (x0.27)
Test#2 (FP)
56.7k
20.05k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.81k
6.17k (x0.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.14k
4.73k (x0.39)
TOTAL
144.57k
45.05k (x0.31)
Performance/W
E5-1620 v2
i7-6600U
Test#1 (Integers)
399 points/W
940 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
436 points/W
1337 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
183 points/W
411 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
93 points/W
315 points/W
TOTAL
1112 points/W
3004 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-1620 v2
i7-6600U
Test#1 (Integers)
3217 points/GHz
2497 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3113 points/GHz
3211 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1238 points/GHz
813 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1244 points/GHz
1449 points/GHz
TOTAL
8812 points/GHz
7970 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4