| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs Core i5-3570K


Description
Both models E5-1620 v2 and i5-3570K are based on Ivy Bridge architecture.

"Ivy Bridge is the last Intel microarchitecture for which there is official driver support for Windows XP . It is made under 22 nm Tri-Gate transistor (""3D"") technology and is basically a Sandy Bridge shrink. It has PCI Express 3.0 support and RdRand instruction for security tasks."

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-1620 v2 gets a score of 144.6 k points while the i5-3570K gets 120.2 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-1620 v2 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-3570K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306e4
306a9
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4 /8
4/4
TDP
130 W
77 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
10240 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2013
April 2012
Mean monothread perf.
34.37k points
34.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
144.57k points
120.16k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-1620 v2
i5-3570K
Test#1 (Integers)
12.55k
12.55k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
12.14k
12.14k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
4.9k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
4.98k (x1.03)
TOTAL
34.37k
34.57k (x1.01)

Multithread

E5-1620 v2

i5-3570K
Test#1 (Integers)
51.93k
47.53k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
56.7k
46.16k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.81k
18.36k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.14k
8.1k (x0.67)
TOTAL
144.57k
120.16k (x0.83)

Performance/W
E5-1620 v2
i5-3570K
Test#1 (Integers)
399 points/W
617 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
436 points/W
599 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
183 points/W
238 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
93 points/W
105 points/W
TOTAL
1112 points/W
1560 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-1620 v2
i5-3570K
Test#1 (Integers)
3217 points/GHz
3303 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3113 points/GHz
3194 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1238 points/GHz
1288 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1244 points/GHz
1310 points/GHz
TOTAL
8812 points/GHz
9096 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4