Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs Core i5-10400T
Description
The E5-1620 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-1620 v2 gets a score of 144.6 k points while the i5-10400T gets 235.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.6 times faster than the E5-1620 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-1620 v2 gets a score of 144.6 k points while the i5-10400T gets 235.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.6 times faster than the E5-1620 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306e4
a0653
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4 /8
6/12
TDP
130 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
10240 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2013
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
34.37k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
144.57k points
307.18k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-1620 v2
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
12.55k
12.5k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
12.14k
19.05k (x1.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
4.72k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
10.3k (x2.12)
TOTAL
34.37k
46.57k (x1.36)
Multithread
E5-1620 v2
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
51.93k
74.58k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
56.7k
126.96k (x2.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.81k
31.76k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.14k
2.5k (x0.21)
TOTAL
144.57k
235.8k (x1.63)
Performance/W
E5-1620 v2
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
399 points/W
2131 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
436 points/W
3627 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
183 points/W
907 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
93 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
1112 points/W
6737 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-1620 v2
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
3217 points/GHz
3472 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3113 points/GHz
5292 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1238 points/GHz
1312 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1244 points/GHz
2860 points/GHz
TOTAL
8812 points/GHz
12936 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4