Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs Ryzen 7 1800X
Description
The E5-1620 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 1800X is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-1620 v2 gets a score of 144.6 k points while the 1800X gets 389.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 1800X is 2.7 times faster than the E5-1620 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-1620 v2 gets a score of 144.6 k points while the 1800X gets 389.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 1800X is 2.7 times faster than the E5-1620 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306e4
800f11
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
AM4
Cores/Threads
4 /8
8/16
TDP
130 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
10240 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
September 2013
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
34.37k points
61.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
144.57k points
410.47k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-1620 v2
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
12.55k
15.11k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
12.14k
23.46k (x1.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
5.64k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
17.52k (x3.61)
TOTAL
34.37k
61.72k (x1.8)
Multithread
E5-1620 v2
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
51.93k
119.5k (x2.3)
Test#2 (FP)
56.7k
198.79k (x3.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.81k
59.75k (x2.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.14k
11.58k (x0.95)
TOTAL
144.57k
389.62k (x2.69)
Performance/W
E5-1620 v2
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
399 points/W
1258 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
436 points/W
2092 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
183 points/W
629 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
93 points/W
122 points/W
TOTAL
1112 points/W
4101 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-1620 v2
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
3217 points/GHz
3776 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3113 points/GHz
5866 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1238 points/GHz
1409 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1244 points/GHz
4379 points/GHz
TOTAL
8812 points/GHz
15430 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4