| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs Core i7-1280P


Description
The E5-1620 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i7-1280P is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-1620 v2 gets a score of 144.6 k points while the i7-1280P gets 419.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1280P is 2.9 times faster than the E5-1620 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306e4
906a3
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Alder Lake-P
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
4 /8
14/20
TDP
130 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x1280+6x2048 kB
Cache L3
10240 kB
24576 kB
Date
September 2013
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
34.37k points
91.45k points
Mean multithread perf.
144.57k points
468.3k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-1620 v2
i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
12.55k
22.76k (x1.81)
Test#2 (FP)
12.14k
25.2k (x2.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
12.64k (x2.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
13.33k (x2.75)
TOTAL
34.37k
73.92k (x2.15)

Multithread

E5-1620 v2

i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
51.93k
149.83k (x2.89)
Test#2 (FP)
56.7k
170.43k (x3.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.81k
83.32k (x3.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.14k
15.67k (x1.29)
TOTAL
144.57k
419.25k (x2.9)

Performance/W
E5-1620 v2
i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
399 points/W
5351 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
436 points/W
6087 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
183 points/W
2976 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
93 points/W
560 points/W
TOTAL
1112 points/W
14973 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-1620 v2
i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
3217 points/GHz
4741 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3113 points/GHz
5251 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1238 points/GHz
2632 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1244 points/GHz
2776 points/GHz
TOTAL
8812 points/GHz
15401 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4