| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs Core i7-1165G7


Description
The E5-1620 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-1620 v2 gets a score of 144.6 k points while the i7-1165G7 gets 190.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1165G7 is 1.3 times faster than the E5-1620 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306e4
806c1
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Tiger Lake-UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
4 /8
4/8
TDP
130 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
10240 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2013
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
34.37k points
62.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
144.57k points
210.4k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-1620 v2
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
12.55k
16.27k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
12.14k
25.74k (x2.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
11.5k (x2.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
10.82k (x2.23)
TOTAL
34.37k
64.32k (x1.87)

Multithread

E5-1620 v2

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
51.93k
54k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
56.7k
88.76k (x1.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.81k
35.23k (x1.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.14k
12.14k (x1)
TOTAL
144.57k
190.12k (x1.32)

Performance/W
E5-1620 v2
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
399 points/W
1928 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
436 points/W
3170 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
183 points/W
1258 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
93 points/W
434 points/W
TOTAL
1112 points/W
6790 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-1620 v2
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3217 points/GHz
3462 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3113 points/GHz
5476 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1238 points/GHz
2447 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1244 points/GHz
2302 points/GHz
TOTAL
8812 points/GHz
13686 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4