Xeon E3-1225 vs Xeon Silver 4110
Description
The E3-1225 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the 4110 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1225 gets a score of 44.8 k points while the 4110 gets 156.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 4110 is 3.5 times faster than the E3-1225. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1225 gets a score of 44.8 k points while the 4110 gets 156.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 4110 is 3.5 times faster than the E3-1225. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206a7
50654
Core
Sandy Bridge
Skylake-SP
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA3647
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
95 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
11264 kB
Date
April 2011
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
23.94k points
45.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
68.97k points
281.48k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E3-1225
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
2.63k
3k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
7.2k
12.29k (x1.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.71k
3.64k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.55k
6.55k (x2.57)
TOTAL
16.08k
25.46k (x1.58)
Multithread
E3-1225
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
8.23k
20.42k (x2.48)
Test#2 (FP)
22.82k
95.83k (x4.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.68k
30.88k (x2.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.12k
9.7k (x4.58)
TOTAL
44.85k
156.83k (x3.5)
Performance/W
E3-1225
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
87 points/W
240 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
240 points/W
1127 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
123 points/W
363 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
22 points/W
114 points/W
TOTAL
472 points/W
1845 points/W
Performance/GHz
E3-1225
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
772 points/GHz
998 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2117 points/GHz
4095 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1091 points/GHz
1212 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
750 points/GHz
2182 points/GHz
TOTAL
4731 points/GHz
8487 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4