| | | | | | |

Xeon E3-1225 vs Core 2 Quad Q8400


Description
The E3-1225 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the Q8400 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1225 gets a score of 69 k points while the Q8400 gets 51.9 k points.

Summarizing, the E3-1225 is 1.3 times faster than the Q8400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206a7
1067a
Core
Sandy Bridge
Yorkfield
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.666 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.666 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
95 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
128+128 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
0 kB
Date
April 2011
April 2009
Mean monothread perf.
23.94k points
14.04k points
Mean multithread perf.
68.97k points
51.92k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E3-1225
Q8400
Test#1 (Integers)
2.63k
2.44k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
7.2k
6.24k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.71k
2.62k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.55k
1.43k (x0.56)
TOTAL
16.08k
12.73k (x0.79)

Multithread

E3-1225

Q8400
Test#1 (Integers)
8.23k
9.71k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
22.82k
24.81k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.68k
10.51k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.12k
2.03k (x0.96)
TOTAL
44.85k
47.05k (x1.05)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E3-1225
Q8400
Test#1 (Integers)
9.65k
3.08k (x0.32)
Test#2 (FP)
7.76k
6.8k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.95k
2.73k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.57k
1.42k (x0.55)
TOTAL
23.94k
14.04k (x0.59)

Multithread

E3-1225

Q8400
Test#1 (Integers)
30.52k
12.25k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
24.1k
26.84k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.01k
10.82k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.34k
2.02k (x0.86)
TOTAL
68.97k
51.92k (x0.75)

Performance/W
E3-1225
Q8400
Test#1 (Integers)
321 points/W
129 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
254 points/W
283 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
126 points/W
114 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
25 points/W
21 points/W
TOTAL
726 points/W
547 points/W

Performance/GHz
E3-1225
Q8400
Test#1 (Integers)
2839 points/GHz
1157 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2283 points/GHz
2551 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1162 points/GHz
1025 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
757 points/GHz
532 points/GHz
TOTAL
7041 points/GHz
5265 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4