| | | | | | |

Xeon E3-1225 vs Core i3-6100


Description
The E3-1225 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i3-6100 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1225 gets a score of 69 k points while the i3-6100 gets 91.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-6100 is 1.3 times faster than the E3-1225. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206a7
506e3
Core
Sandy Bridge
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
95 W
51 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2011
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
23.94k points
52.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
68.97k points
112.28k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E3-1225
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
2.63k
3.81k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
7.2k
15.65k (x2.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.71k
5.14k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.55k
4.28k (x1.68)
TOTAL
16.08k
28.89k (x1.8)

Multithread

E3-1225

i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
8.23k
7.75k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
22.82k
37.33k (x1.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.68k
12.13k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.12k
3.56k (x1.68)
TOTAL
44.85k
60.77k (x1.35)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E3-1225
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
9.65k
13.76k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
7.76k
19.96k (x2.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.95k
5.44k (x1.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.57k
4.4k (x1.71)
TOTAL
23.94k
43.55k (x1.82)

Multithread

E3-1225

i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
30.52k
28.99k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
24.1k
45.75k (x1.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.01k
12.72k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.34k
3.68k (x1.57)
TOTAL
68.97k
91.14k (x1.32)

Performance/W
E3-1225
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
321 points/W
568 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
254 points/W
897 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
126 points/W
249 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
25 points/W
72 points/W
TOTAL
726 points/W
1787 points/W

Performance/GHz
E3-1225
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
2839 points/GHz
3719 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2283 points/GHz
5393 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1162 points/GHz
1469 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
757 points/GHz
1189 points/GHz
TOTAL
7041 points/GHz
11770 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4