| | | | | | |

Xeon E3-1225 vs Celeron 3855U


Description
The E3-1225 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the 3855U is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1225 gets a score of 69 k points while the 3855U gets 24.6 k points.

Summarizing, the E3-1225 is 2.8 times faster than the 3855U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206a7
406e3
Core
Sandy Bridge
Skylake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
1.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2096 kB
Date
April 2011
December 2015
Mean monothread perf.
23.94k points
19.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
68.97k points
24.56k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E3-1225
3855U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.63k
1.64k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
7.2k
6.72k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.71k
2.06k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.55k
2.4k (x0.94)
TOTAL
16.08k
12.83k (x0.8)

Multithread

E3-1225

3855U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.23k
2.2k (x0.27)
Test#2 (FP)
22.82k
9.59k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.68k
2.76k (x0.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.12k
2.27k (x1.07)
TOTAL
44.85k
16.81k (x0.37)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E3-1225
3855U
Test#1 (Integers)
9.65k
5.93k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
7.76k
8.53k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.95k
2.28k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.57k
2.5k (x0.97)
TOTAL
23.94k
19.24k (x0.8)

Multithread

E3-1225

3855U
Test#1 (Integers)
30.52k
7.87k (x0.26)
Test#2 (FP)
24.1k
11.28k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.01k
2.91k (x0.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.34k
2.5k (x1.07)
TOTAL
68.97k
24.56k (x0.36)

Performance/W
E3-1225
3855U
Test#1 (Integers)
321 points/W
524 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
254 points/W
752 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
126 points/W
194 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
25 points/W
166 points/W
TOTAL
726 points/W
1637 points/W

Performance/GHz
E3-1225
3855U
Test#1 (Integers)
2839 points/GHz
3706 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2283 points/GHz
5333 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1162 points/GHz
1423 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
757 points/GHz
1562 points/GHz
TOTAL
7041 points/GHz
12024 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4