| | | | | | |

Xeon E3-1225 vs Core i3-1115G4


Description
The E3-1225 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1225 gets a score of 69 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 101.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 1.5 times faster than the E3-1225. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206a7
806c1
Core
Sandy Bridge
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
95 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2011
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
23.94k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
68.97k points
137.96k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E3-1225
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
2.63k
3.75k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
7.2k
17.22k (x2.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.71k
9.79k (x2.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.55k
8.21k (x3.22)
TOTAL
16.08k
38.97k (x2.42)

Multithread

E3-1225

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
8.23k
9.19k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
22.82k
35.47k (x1.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.68k
19.14k (x1.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.12k
5.82k (x2.75)
TOTAL
44.85k
69.62k (x1.55)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E3-1225
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
9.65k
12.9k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
7.76k
21.4k (x2.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.95k
10.73k (x2.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.57k
8.16k (x3.17)
TOTAL
23.94k
53.19k (x2.22)

Multithread

E3-1225

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
30.52k
30.31k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
24.1k
45.13k (x1.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.01k
20.17k (x1.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.34k
5.77k (x2.47)
TOTAL
68.97k
101.38k (x1.47)

Performance/W
E3-1225
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
321 points/W
1082 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
254 points/W
1612 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
126 points/W
720 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
25 points/W
206 points/W
TOTAL
726 points/W
3621 points/W

Performance/GHz
E3-1225
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
2839 points/GHz
3147 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2283 points/GHz
5219 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1162 points/GHz
2616 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
757 points/GHz
1991 points/GHz
TOTAL
7041 points/GHz
12974 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4