| | | | | | |

Xeon E3-1230 v5 vs E5-2620 v4


Description
The E3-1230 v5 is based on Skylake architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1230 v5 gets a score of 37.9 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 182.4 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 4.8 times faster than the E3-1230 v5. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
406f1
Core
Skylake-S
Broadwell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
80 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
20480 kB
Date
October 2015
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
9.52k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
37.88k points
237.83k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E3-1230 v5
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
0.7k
2.6k (x3.74)
Test#2 (FP)
2.8k
7.55k (x2.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0.85k
2.61k (x3.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.88k
2.03k (x1.08)
TOTAL
6.23k
14.79k (x2.37)

Multithread

E3-1230 v5

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
2.74k
17.41k (x6.37)
Test#2 (FP)
12.87k
75.46k (x5.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.89k
26.25k (x6.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.03k
4.65k (x0.77)
TOTAL
25.52k
123.78k (x4.85)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E3-1230 v5
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
2.59k
8.22k (x3.18)
Test#2 (FP)
3.94k
12.06k (x3.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1k
4.01k (x4.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
2k
2.89k (x1.45)
TOTAL
9.52k
27.18k (x2.85)

Multithread

E3-1230 v5

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
10.4k
61.34k (x5.9)
Test#2 (FP)
16.64k
90.21k (x5.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.51k
26.2k (x5.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.33k
4.62k (x0.73)
TOTAL
37.88k
182.37k (x4.81)

Performance/W
E3-1230 v5
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
130 points/W
722 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
208 points/W
1061 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
54 points/W
TOTAL
474 points/W
2146 points/W

Performance/GHz
E3-1230 v5
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
681 points/GHz
2739 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1037 points/GHz
4021 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
263 points/GHz
1335 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
525 points/GHz
963 points/GHz
TOTAL
2506 points/GHz
9059 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4