Xeon E3-1230 v5 vs Celeron N4100
Description
The E3-1230 v5 is based on Skylake architecture while the N4100 is based on Goldmont Plus.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1230 v5 gets a score of 37.9 k points while the N4100 gets 40.6 k points.
Summarizing, the N4100 is 1.1 times faster than the E3-1230 v5. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1230 v5 gets a score of 37.9 k points while the N4100 gets 40.6 k points.
Summarizing, the N4100 is 1.1 times faster than the E3-1230 v5. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
706a1
Core
Skylake-S
Gemini Lake
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA1090
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
80 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
kB
Date
October 2015
December 2017
Mean monothread perf.
9.52k points
17.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
37.88k points
40.57k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E3-1230 v5
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
2.59k
4.72k (x1.82)
Test#2 (FP)
3.94k
6.99k (x1.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1k
2.69k (x2.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
2k
2.81k (x1.41)
TOTAL
9.52k
17.21k (x1.81)
Multithread
E3-1230 v5
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
10.4k
12.54k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
16.64k
17.99k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.51k
6.71k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.33k
3.33k (x0.53)
TOTAL
37.88k
40.57k (x1.07)
Performance/W
E3-1230 v5
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
130 points/W
2090 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
208 points/W
2999 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56 points/W
1118 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
555 points/W
TOTAL
474 points/W
6762 points/W
Performance/GHz
E3-1230 v5
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
681 points/GHz
1966 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1037 points/GHz
2914 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
263 points/GHz
1122 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
525 points/GHz
1171 points/GHz
TOTAL
2506 points/GHz
7172 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4