Xeon E3-1220 v3 vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
Description
The E3-1220 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the 4900HS is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1220 v3 gets a score of 140.8 k points while the 4900HS gets 360.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 2.6 times faster than the E3-1220 v3 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1220 v3 gets a score of 140.8 k points while the 4900HS gets 360.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 2.6 times faster than the E3-1220 v3 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
860f01
Core
Haswell-WS
Renoir
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
4 /4
8/16
TDP
80 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
June 2013
March 2020
Mean monothread perf.
39.16k points
53k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.76k points
360.57k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E3-1220 v3
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
19.17k
14.87k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
21.53k (x2.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.79k
8.39k (x1.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.65k
8.21k (x1.77)
TOTAL
39.16k
53k (x1.35)
Multithread
E3-1220 v3
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
73.13k
124.63k (x1.7)
Test#2 (FP)
42.06k
158.62k (x3.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.03k
69.79k (x3.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.54k
7.53k (x1)
TOTAL
140.76k
360.57k (x2.56)
Performance/W
E3-1220 v3
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
914 points/W
3561 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
526 points/W
4532 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
225 points/W
1994 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
94 points/W
215 points/W
TOTAL
1759 points/W
10302 points/W
Performance/GHz
E3-1220 v3
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
5478 points/GHz
3457 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3014 points/GHz
5007 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1368 points/GHz
1952 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1328 points/GHz
1910 points/GHz
TOTAL
11188 points/GHz
12326 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4