Xeon E3-1220 v3 vs Ryzen 7 1700X
Description
The E3-1220 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the 1700X is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1220 v3 gets a score of 140.8 k points while the 1700X gets 372.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700X is 2.6 times faster than the E3-1220 v3 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1220 v3 gets a score of 140.8 k points while the 1700X gets 372.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700X is 2.6 times faster than the E3-1220 v3 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
800f11
Core
Haswell-WS
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
AM4
Cores/Threads
4 /4
8/16
TDP
80 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
June 2013
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
39.16k points
56.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.76k points
372.73k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E3-1220 v3
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
19.17k
13.72k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
22.48k (x2.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.79k
5.12k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.65k
15.44k (x3.32)
TOTAL
39.16k
56.76k (x1.45)
Multithread
E3-1220 v3
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
73.13k
110.92k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
42.06k
200.56k (x4.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.03k
54.24k (x3.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.54k
7.01k (x0.93)
TOTAL
140.76k
372.73k (x2.65)
Performance/W
E3-1220 v3
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
914 points/W
1168 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
526 points/W
2111 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
225 points/W
571 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
94 points/W
74 points/W
TOTAL
1759 points/W
3923 points/W
Performance/GHz
E3-1220 v3
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
5478 points/GHz
3611 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3014 points/GHz
5916 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1368 points/GHz
1348 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1328 points/GHz
4063 points/GHz
TOTAL
11188 points/GHz
14938 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4