| | | | | | |

Xeon E3-1220 v3 vs Ryzen 3 3200U


Description
The E3-1220 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the 3200U is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1220 v3 gets a score of 140.8 k points while the 3200U gets 61.2 k points.

Summarizing, the E3-1220 v3 is 2.3 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
810f81
Core
Haswell-WS
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4 /4
2/4
TDP
80 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2013
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
39.16k points
38.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.76k points
61.23k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E3-1220 v3
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
19.17k
11.13k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
19.38k (x1.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.79k
4.47k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.65k
3.87k (x0.83)
TOTAL
39.16k
38.85k (x0.99)

Multithread

E3-1220 v3

3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
73.13k
17.13k (x0.23)
Test#2 (FP)
42.06k
30.56k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.03k
9.44k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.54k
4.09k (x0.54)
TOTAL
140.76k
61.23k (x0.43)

Performance/W
E3-1220 v3
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
914 points/W
1142 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
526 points/W
2038 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
225 points/W
629 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
94 points/W
273 points/W
TOTAL
1759 points/W
4082 points/W

Performance/GHz
E3-1220 v3
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
5478 points/GHz
3181 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3014 points/GHz
5536 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1368 points/GHz
1277 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1328 points/GHz
1105 points/GHz
TOTAL
11188 points/GHz
11099 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4