Xeon Bronze 3206R vs Xeon X3430
Description
The 3206R is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the X3430 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 103.8 k points while the X3430 gets 35.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 2.9 times faster than the X3430. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 103.8 k points while the X3430 gets 35.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 2.9 times faster than the X3430. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
106e5
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Lynnfield
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647-0
LGA1156
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/4
TDP
85 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
8192 kB
Date
February 2020
October 2009
Mean monothread perf.
31.52k points
15.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
216.02k points
55.66k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3206R
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
1.97k
1.75k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
8.15k
3.95k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.37k
2.29k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.84k
2.66k (x0.55)
TOTAL
17.32k
10.65k (x0.61)
Multithread
3206R
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
15.73k
6.81k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
64.78k
15.37k (x0.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.06k
8.9k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.21k
4.42k (x0.85)
TOTAL
103.77k
35.49k (x0.34)
Performance/W
3206R
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
185 points/W
72 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
762 points/W
162 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
212 points/W
94 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
61 points/W
47 points/W
TOTAL
1221 points/W
374 points/W
Performance/GHz
3206R
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
1035 points/GHz
623 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4287 points/GHz
1411 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
820 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2547 points/GHz
948 points/GHz
TOTAL
9115 points/GHz
3802 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4