Xeon Bronze 3206R vs Xeon E5506
Description
The 3206R is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the E5506 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 103.8 k points while the E5506 gets 59.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 1.7 times faster than the E5506 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 103.8 k points while the E5506 gets 59.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 1.7 times faster than the E5506 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
106a5
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Gainestown
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
2.133 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647-0
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
8/8
4 /4
TDP
85 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
4096 kB
Date
February 2020
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
31.52k points
9.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
216.02k points
90.45k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3206R
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
1.97k
1.21k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
8.15k
2.75k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.37k
1.94k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.84k
0.78k (x0.16)
TOTAL
17.32k
6.68k (x0.39)
Multithread
3206R
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
15.73k
12.25k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
64.78k
25.55k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.06k
17.1k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.21k
5.01k (x0.96)
TOTAL
103.77k
59.9k (x0.58)
Performance/W
3206R
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
185 points/W
153 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
762 points/W
319 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
212 points/W
214 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
61 points/W
63 points/W
TOTAL
1221 points/W
749 points/W
Performance/GHz
3206R
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
1035 points/GHz
565 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4287 points/GHz
1291 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
910 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2547 points/GHz
366 points/GHz
TOTAL
9115 points/GHz
3132 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4