| | | | | | |

Xeon Bronze 3206R vs Xeon E3-1220 v3


Description
The 3206R is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the E3-1220 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 216 k points while the E3-1220 v3 gets 140.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 3206R is 1.5 times faster than the E3-1220 v3 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
306c3
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Haswell-WS
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647-0
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
8/8
4 /4
TDP
85 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
8192 kB
Date
February 2020
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
31.52k points
39.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
216.02k points
140.76k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3206R
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
1.97k
3.45k (x1.75)
Test#2 (FP)
8.15k
9.96k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.37k
4.26k (x1.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.84k
4.27k (x0.88)
TOTAL
17.32k
21.94k (x1.27)

Multithread

3206R

E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
15.73k
14.01k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
64.78k
37.68k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.06k
17.05k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.21k
7.35k (x1.41)
TOTAL
103.77k
76.09k (x0.73)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3206R
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
12.92k
19.17k (x1.48)
Test#2 (FP)
10.97k
10.55k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.54k
4.79k (x1.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.09k
4.65k (x0.91)
TOTAL
31.52k
39.16k (x1.24)

Multithread

3206R

E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
103.33k
73.13k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
87.67k
42.06k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
18.03k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.91k
7.54k (x1.54)
TOTAL
216.02k
140.76k (x0.65)

Performance/W
3206R
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
1216 points/W
914 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1031 points/W
526 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
237 points/W
225 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
58 points/W
94 points/W
TOTAL
2541 points/W
1759 points/W

Performance/GHz
3206R
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
6801 points/GHz
5478 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5774 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1334 points/GHz
1368 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2678 points/GHz
1328 points/GHz
TOTAL
16588 points/GHz
11188 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4