Xeon Bronze 3206R vs Core 2 Duo T7250
Description
The 3206R is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the T7250 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 103.8 k points while the T7250 gets 13 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 8 times faster than the T7250 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 103.8 k points while the T7250 gets 13 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 8 times faster than the T7250 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
6fd
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Merom
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647-0
Socket P
Cores/Threads
8/8
2/2
TDP
85 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
0 kB
Date
February 2020
September 2007
Mean monothread perf.
31.52k points
7.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
216.02k points
13.82k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3206R
T7250
Test#1 (Integers)
1.97k
1.96k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
8.15k
2k (x0.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.37k
1.96k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.84k
1.22k (x0.25)
TOTAL
17.32k
7.14k (x0.41)
Multithread
3206R
T7250
Test#1 (Integers)
15.73k
3.87k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
64.78k
3.95k (x0.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.06k
3.8k (x0.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.21k
1.34k (x0.26)
TOTAL
103.77k
12.96k (x0.12)
Performance/W
3206R
T7250
Test#1 (Integers)
185 points/W
111 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
762 points/W
113 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
212 points/W
108 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
61 points/W
38 points/W
TOTAL
1221 points/W
370 points/W
Performance/GHz
3206R
T7250
Test#1 (Integers)
1035 points/GHz
978 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4287 points/GHz
1000 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
981 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2547 points/GHz
612 points/GHz
TOTAL
9115 points/GHz
3571 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4